svn commit: r263755 - head/sys/kern

[David Xu]

On 2014/03/29 12:14, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> I asked if multpiple concurrent calls to fsetown(.., &pointer) could 
> result in some corruption in the kernel - if they could, we would have 
> a problem in the future. I decided to read the code once more and 
> fsetown seems to be safe in this regard after all and with that in 
> mind the patch looks good to me. This thread is too long already, so 
> I'm stepping down on this one in case there are some futher concerns. 
This thread is really long, but things must be clarified, so it was not
long enough. :-)
Previously I supposed you had read the fsetown code, if not, I was wrong,
lol.