svn commit: r226040 - head/sys/netinet6

[Bjoern A. Zeeb]

On 5. Oct 2011, at 16:27 , Qing Li wrote:

> Author: qingli
> Date: Wed Oct  5 16:27:11 2011
> New Revision: 226040
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/226040
> 
> Log:
>  The IFA_RTSELF instead of the IFA_ROUTE flag should be checked to
>  determine if a loopback route should be installed for an interface
>  IPv6 address. Another condition is the address must not belong to a
>  looopback interface.

If I set useloopback to 0 my loopback will no longer have a route to itself anymore now?

> 
>  Reviewed by:	hrs
>  MFC after:	3 days
> 
> Modified:
>  head/sys/netinet6/in6.c
> 
> Modified: head/sys/netinet6/in6.c
> ==============================================================================
> --- head/sys/netinet6/in6.c	Wed Oct  5 16:03:47 2011	(r226039)
> +++ head/sys/netinet6/in6.c	Wed Oct  5 16:27:11 2011	(r226040)
> @@ -1810,9 +1810,9 @@ in6_ifinit(struct ifnet *ifp, struct in6
> 	/*
> 	 * add a loopback route to self
> 	 */
> -	if (!(ia->ia_flags & IFA_ROUTE)
> +	if (!(ia->ia_flags & IFA_RTSELF)
> 	    && (V_nd6_useloopback
> -		|| (ifp->if_flags & IFF_LOOPBACK))) {
> +		&& !(ifp->if_flags & IFF_LOOPBACK))) {
> 		error = ifa_add_loopback_route((struct ifaddr *)ia,
> 				       (struct sockaddr *)&ia->ia_addr);
> 		if (error == 0)

-- 
Bjoern A. Zeeb                                 You have to have visions!
         Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family.