svn commit: r217213 - head/lib/bind

Warner Losh imp at bsdimp.com
Wed Jan 12 00:05:19 UTC 2011


On 01/10/2011 22:04, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 01/10/2011 11:33, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On Sunday, January 09, 2011 6:47:11 pm Doug Barton wrote:
>
>>>   # Use the right version of the atomic.h file from lib/isc
>>> -ISC_ATOMIC_ARCH=${MACHINE_CPUARCH:S/i386/x86_32/:S/amd64/x86_32/}
>>> +.if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "amd64" || ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "i386"
>>
>> This should use MACHINE_CPUARCH instead of MACHINE_ARCH?
>
> When this block was first written I don't think _CPUARCH existed at 
> all, and/or had not been MFC'ed. Subsequently, nwhitehorn made the 
> change in r209886 to use _CPUARCH in both places, however the diff 
> from Warner's commit in r217071 (which is what I based my change on) 
> clearly showed _ARCH 
> (http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/head/lib/bind/config.mk?r1=209886&r2=217071). 
> So, I'm not sure where svn went sideways there, but it's definitely 
> "odd."
>
> I have no objection to putting it back to the state that it was in at 
> r209886, although frankly less diffs to RELENG_[78] without good 
> reason make my life easier.

yea, that's the right bias.  I did MFC the CPUARCH stuff to 8, but not to 7.

Warner
>
>
> Doug
>
> PS, this is just another reason why I prefer pre-commit review when 
> convenient ...
>
>
>>> +ISC_ATOMIC_ARCH=    x86_32
>>> +.else
>>> +ISC_ATOMIC_ARCH=    ${MACHINE_CPUARCH}
>>> +.endif
>>>
>>>   # Optional features
>>>   .if ${MK_BIND_LARGE_FILE} == "yes"
>>>
>>
>
>
>



More information about the svn-src-head mailing list