svn commit: r216977 - in head/libexec/rtld-elf: amd64 i386
dougb at FreeBSD.org
Wed Jan 5 19:59:24 UTC 2011
On 01/05/2011 10:59, Alexander Best wrote:
> judging from the discussion going on right now it seems those flags will be
> grouped together to form a new variable. so things will probably change shortly
> and fixing the order is probably not necessary.
Much better to fix the problem properly now than to rely on future work
that may or may not happen. I realize that you alluded to this later in
your message, but I think as a general principle this is worth reinforcing.
> some people have proposed hacking into clang which i personally think is a very
> bad idea. why not contact the clang developers? they might like the idea of a
> switch disabling all advanced extensions for every architecture?
I agree with this. We have a very awkward situation right now with lots
of local hacks in our version of gcc that in an ideal world we would not
replicate with clang; particularly considering the much lower barrier to
entry when it comes to contributing things back.
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
More information about the svn-src-head