svn commit: r212964 - head/sys/kern
Alexander Motin
mav at FreeBSD.org
Tue Sep 21 17:02:25 UTC 2010
Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
>> Err, I don't think _mtx_lock_sleep() is guarded in that fashion? I
>> have an
>> old patch to do that but have never committed it. If we want that we
>> should
>> probably change rwlocks and sxlocks to have also not block when
>> panicstr is
>> set.
>
> Seems to me you are backing into interesting territory here- getting a
> bit more like Solaris.
>
> If you *do* do this, then you really *do* need to stop all other CPUs
> when you panic, or else it's likely you'll double panic more often than
> not.
May be it is not so bad idea to get more coherent memory snapshot?
--
Alexander Motin
More information about the svn-src-head
mailing list