svn commit: r208459 - head/release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/hardware

[Marius Strobl]

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 01:39:42PM +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> On 2010.05.23 19:46:19 +0000, Marius Strobl wrote:
> 
> > New Revision: 208459
> >
> > Log:
> >   Update the sparc64 hardware list regarding machines that will be supported
> >   beginning with 8.1-RELEASE as well as correct some existing entries and
> >   add previously missed ones.
> 
> >  	<listitem>
> > -	  <para>&netra; t1 105</para>
> > +	  <para>&sun; &netra; t1 100/105</para>
> 
> If the product is called Netra and you just added the Sun part to
> identify the company it should just be Sun, and not &sun; as you are
> refering to Sun the company and not as part of a trademark.
> 
> (It's a bit since I looked at it, but I'm rather sure above ist still
> the case.)
> 
> > +      <para>Starting with 8.1-RELEASE, &arch.sparc64; systems based on
> > +	&fujitsu; &sparc64; V are also supported by &os;, which
> > +	includes the following known working systems:</para>
> 
> Same here, if you are refering to Fujitsu the company it should not
> include a trademark symbol.
> 

It's kind of hard to think of a case where one would use the name
of a company in a way that doesn't refer to the company but rather
to a trademark when even using "company product" doesn't mean to
refer to it as part of a trademark :) I.e. when would one have to
use the company trademark?
In any case, do the attached patches look correct to you?

Marius

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: article.sgml.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 4824 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head/attachments/20100524/1f32cf66/article.sgml.bin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sparc.sgml.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 619 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head/attachments/20100524/1f32cf66/sparc.sgml.bin