svn commit: r207851 - head/sys/dev/sge

Bjoern A. Zeeb bz at FreeBSD.org
Tue May 18 23:30:08 UTC 2010


On Tue, 18 May 2010, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:

> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:53:27PM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>> On Tue, 18 May 2010, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 03:27:33AM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 10 May 2010, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Author: yongari
>>>>> Date: Mon May 10 17:14:14 2010
>>>>> New Revision: 207851
>>>>> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/207851
>>>>>
>>>>> Log:
>>>>> Implement TSO and TSO over VLAN. Increase number of allowed
>>>>> fragmentation of mbuf chain to 32 from 16 because TSO can send 64KB
>>>>> sized packet which in turn requires long list of mbuf chain. Due to
>>>>> lack of documentation, I'm not sure whether driver have to pull up
>>>>> ethernet/IP/TCP header with options to make controller work but
>>>>> driver have to parse TCP header to update pseudo TCP checksum
>>>>> anyway. The controller expects pseudo TCP checksum computed by
>>>>> upper stack and the checksum should follow the MS NDIS
>>>>> specification to make TSO work.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tested by:	xclin <xclin <> cs dot nctu dot edu dot tw >
>>>>
>>>> This brings in INET as a dependency for the driver and fails on my
>>>> 	nooptions INET
>>>> 	nooptions INET6
>>>> kernels (in_pseudo()).
>>>>
>>>
>>> AFAIK sge(4) is not the only driver that has INET dependency. I
>>> think we need IPv6 offloading framework(checksum offloading, TSO4
>>
>> There is no checksum on IPv6.
>>
>
> Yes, but controllers that computes only partial checksum for
> received frames require parsing IPv4/IPv6 header to support
> checksum offloading. If we have good framework we can avoid
> duplicated code as well as INET/INET6 dependency.
>
>>> and TSO6) before removing INET dependency in various drivers.
>>> Most recent ethernet controllers support IPv6 offloading and
>>> FreeBSD still lacks these nice features.
>>
>> This is true, but we should (still) fix this and work on a better
>> solution.  You may remember that I tried to get this discussion
>> started twice during the last 12 months.  First time after I added
>> the inet depency in sys/conf/files for all the other drivers that
>> have the same problem(s).
>>
>> I will be very happy to chat with you and np@ and maybe tuexen@ for
>> SCTP and Drew and Jack again to get this all sorted out.
>>
>
> I'm also happy to go that direction.

Great!

> But it wouldn't be for 8.1-RELEASE, right?

Right.

-- 
Bjoern A. Zeeb                                     (from 21) Micky Rosa:
    But as we've all said, this game is about the past and the future,
    and tonight we forget about the past. We just focus on the future.


More information about the svn-src-head mailing list