svn commit: r197313 - head/release

[Ken Smith]

On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 15:07 +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:

> I've always been wondering how could docs be more important than livefs?
> I'd rather have -docs iso (which I won't ever download anyways) than
> -livefs one (which is needed far more often, e.g. to fix botched or
> corrupted installation) in addition to disc1.

[ Sorry, a bit distracted testing RC1 stuff right now so I forgot to add
to the first reply ... ]

I also tested dropping SEPARATE_LIVEFS from both amd64 and i386 earlier
in the release cycle just to see if that was even an option and it was
not.  Without SEPARATE_LIVEFS the disc1 iso image overflowed our target
size even with no packages on it.

-- 
                                                Ken Smith
- From there to here, from here to      |       kensmith at cse.buffalo.edu
  there, funny things are everywhere.   |
                      - Theodore Geisel |

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head/attachments/20090918/a4bb7eae/attachment.pgp