svn commit: r189765 - in head: . lib/libc lib/libc/nls

[Coleman Kane]

On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 06:59 +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> Hi Sean!
> 
> On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:12:00 -0500 (CDT)
> "Sean C. Farley" <scf at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> > >> functionality, however, the Citrus website is ambiguous about the
> > >> license.
> > > 	Really? > ambigous
> > > 	Citrus is licensed under BSD License or variant (like
> > > 	Perl or MIT).  It can use with (L)GPL.
> > > 	WWW: http://citrus.bsdclub.org/
> > OK.  Technically, the website is not ambiguous.  It is the license that 
> > is ambiguous.  :)  At least, they claim it is:
> 
> 	Ah, OK.  They, Citrus developers, consider that it is licensed
> 	under BSD License on *BSD, at least.  In fact, on NetBSD/OpenBSD,
> 	it is licensed under BSD License, and we can use it under BSD
> 	License.
> 
> 	But it may be used on other environment like X.  So it is licensed
> 	under dual(multiple?) license.
> 

I thought that X.org was MIT/X11 licensed (which was very very similar
to BSD).

-- 
Coleman Kane
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head/attachments/20090313/39c28a50/attachment.pgp