svn commit: r195200 - in head/usr.sbin: . wake

[Sam Leffler]

Marc Balmer wrote:
>
> Am 30.06.2009 um 21:36 schrieb M. Warner Losh:
>
>> wake really is too generic a name for this.  Why didn't the wol port
>> get committed anyway, it seems to be better than this...
>
> wake is a short, mnemonic and imperative name that describes what the 
> command does. It is exactly the same command as in NetBSD.

And you're conveniently ignoring the "discussion" that took place after 
the netbsd drive-by.

    Sam