svn commit: r190919 - in head/sys: amd64/amd64 amd64/include i386/i386 i386/include

[Ed Schouten]

Hi Steve,

* Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> I thought Christoph and bde were still hashing out the correctness
> of this patch.
> 
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd64/2009-April/012064.html

Yes, so I've only committed a subset of changes of which there were no
major (or in my opinion valid) objections:

- The construct that we use now works with many versions of GCC. There
  is absolutely no reason why we should still try to support GCC <2.95.

- There was also the discussion about __inline vs inline and __volatile
  vs __volatile. As Christoph and I noticed, there is also a lot of
  inconsistency between the usage of the keywords in the current sources
  we have.

I already spent much time discussing this issue with Christoph to get to
at least some compromise.

-- 
 Ed Schouten <ed at 80386.nl>
 WWW: http://80386.nl/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head/attachments/20090411/1f6ecfd5/attachment.pgp