svn commit: r332090 - head/stand/i386

[Ed Maste]

On 9 April 2018 at 15:28, John Baldwin <jhb at freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> I do think we are likely to have far fewer conditional LDFLAGS rather
> than CFLAGS though.  I think if we are only going to have 1 or 2
> instances in the tree then LDFLAGS.LINKER_TYPE might perhaps be
> overkill, but if we think there will be several then I think it is
> more readable.

Indeed, I don't anticipate we'd end up with more than 1 or 2
instances, but even with only the single case today I think it is
clearer (D14998).