svn commit: r332263 - in head: share/man/man4 sys/dev/vmware/vmci sys/modules/vmware/vmci

Rodney W. Grimes freebsd at pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net
Sun Apr 8 02:55:40 UTC 2018


> On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 8:05 PM, Rodney W. Grimes <
> freebsd at pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote:
> 
> > > Author: mp
> > > Date: Sun Apr  8 01:32:56 2018
> > > New Revision: 332263
> > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/332263
> > >
> > > Log:
> > >   Update VMCI license based on comments from core, the FreeBSD
> > Foundation,
> > >   and VMware legal:
> > >   - Add a dual BSD-2 Clause/GPLv2 LICENSE file in the VMCI directory
> > >   - Remove the use of "All Rights Reserved"
> > >   - Per best practice, remove copyright/license info from Makefile
> > >
> > >   Reviewed by: imp, emaste, jhb, Vishnu Dasa <vdasa at vmware.com>
> > >   Approved by: VMware legal via Mark Peek <markpeek at vmware.com>
> > >   Differential Revision:  https://reviews.freebsd.org/D14979
> >
> > Interesting that I was the one that raised issue with this,
> > yet was not included in the diffential resolving it.
> > For an "inclusive" project it seems to do a lot of "exclusive" things.
> >
> 
> This action was also explicitly approved also by core@, in consultation
> with the FF lawyers.
The consulted a free legal service that is mostly involved in GPL,
which, imho, was not legal advice at all.  As in you more or less
get what you pay for in the legal arena, and that free lawyer is
not going to be by your side if you should ever end up in a court.

> You were dropped from the discussions because you weren't adding to the
> discussions, just arguing, I suppose.

You suppose, as in speculating or know for a fact?
Either way, that is an "exclusitory" move.

Most people see someone elses view as being argumentative when they do
not take the time to actually try to understand the other persons view,
or persuade them to take there view.  Any discussion with 2 sides could
be considered an argument.  I find it 

I would assert that I was actually sighting verifiable facts, with
URL's, that clarified what and why certain things had been done with
respect to SPDX rather than hand waving generalizatons that could not
be directly verified.  Sighting users of it without saying how they
used, etc.     How did you put it?  I poo poo'ed on your claims?

-- 
Rod Grimes                                                 rgrimes at freebsd.org


More information about the svn-src-all mailing list