svn commit: r287780 - in head: share/man/man9 sys/kern sys/sys

Warner Losh imp at bsdimp.com
Thu Sep 17 14:12:14 UTC 2015


Hi Hans,

Given how contentious this has been in the past, perhaps it would be better
to
goad people like rrs@ into giving you a positive, explicit OK rather than
relying
on a timeout that may not indicate that your change is good, just that your
reviewers are busy.

Warner

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:39 AM, Hans Petter Selasky <hps at selasky.org>
wrote:

> On 09/17/15 11:07, David Chisnall wrote:
>
>> On 17 Sep 2015, at 08:20, Hans Petter Selasky <hps at selasky.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 09/17/15 00:05, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>>>
>>>> Weren't you explicitly asked not to touch this system without a proper
>>>> review and discussion?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Adding a new function is not touching code.
>>>
>>
>> Adding a new interface to an existing core subsystem is most definitely
>> touching the system. I would expect *anyone* making a change like this to
>> have both the design and code reviewed for sanity checking.
>>
> > For someone who has already been required to have explicit review of any
> changes to the subsystem to skip this step shows a flagrant disregard for
> the project’s policies and best practices.
>
> David,
>
> My patch is _not_ touching the existing callout system. It's touching the
> callout API. Maybe my understanding of touching is different than yours.
> You can voice your conserns in phabricator please, isn't that why we have
> Phabricator?
>
> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3521
>
> The differential review has been out for 14 days with relevant people like
> rss on the reviewers list, and no conserns were raised. Only manual page
> comments from wblock, and those were addressed. I will refer to a well
> known saying, that whoever tier agree. It is a bit late to shout now.
>
> David, I think phabricator allows filtering so that all commits which
> touch sys/kern gets your subscription. At least wblock was automatically
> subscribed because of updating some manual pages. I think that's the way to
> go.
>
> Let's end this discussion here and move it somewhere else.
>
> --HPS
>
>
>


More information about the svn-src-all mailing list