svn commit: r240742 - head/sys/net

[Gleb Smirnoff]

  Nikolay,

On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 05:11:12PM +0300, Nikolay Denev wrote:
N> With both modules I was able to saturate the four GigE interfaces, and got 
N> about ~3.72 Gbits/sec total according to iperf, systat -ifstat showed
N> about 116MB/s per each interface.
N> 
N> However I'm seeing slightly different CPU stat graphs [1], the difference is not big,
N> but with the new if_lagg(4) driver, when the machine is acting as client I'm
N> seeing slightly higher system CPU time, and about the same interrupt, while
N> when acting as server both system and interrupt are slightly lower.
N> But please note that these tests were not very scientifically correct.
N> When the server is available again I might be able to perform several runs and
N> do a proper comparison.

Do I understand correct, that in the above testing "server" means transmitting
traffic and "client" is receiving traffic?

-- 
Totus tuus, Glebius.