svn commit: r237624 - in head: cddl/contrib/opensolaris/cmd/dtrace/test/tst/common/llquantize cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libdtrace/common sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/dtrace sys/cddl/c...

[Pedro Giffuni]

--- Ven 29/6/12, George Neville-Neil <gnn at neville-neil.com> ha scritto:

> Da: George Neville-Neil <gnn at neville-neil.com>
> Oggetto: Re: svn commit: r237624 - in head: cddl/contrib/opensolaris/cmd/dtrace/test/tst/common/llquantize cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libdtrace/common sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/dtrace sys/cddl/c...
> A: pfg at freebsd.org
> Cc: obrien at FreeBSD.org, src-committers at FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all at FreeBSD.org, svn-src-head at FreeBSD.org
> Data: Venerdì 29 giugno 2012, 12:47
> 
> On Jun 29, 2012, at 13:35 , Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> 
> > (Sorry for top-posting]
> > 
> > Actually ...
> > 
> > David pointed out a fundamental flaw on my part.
> > 
> > These are new files under a non-BSD license. Even when
> > they are only scripts used for testing I shouldn't
> have
> > brought them in without -core approval.
> > 
> > I will delete them right away and core shall decide
> > afterwards if and how they can be brought in.
> > 
> 
> Are the files under a CDDL license?  Since that's the
> point of where you added them I don't think that that
> should be an issue.  The issue comes when we might
> ship CDDL code by default, but these are tests and so that
> should not be a problem.
> 

They are under CDDL. I re-read the committer's guide and
they are right where they are.

Now .. David pointed out I am not respecting the code
provenance since I didn't add them to the opensolaris
vendor area, but these files are copyrighted Joyent
Inc (not even Illumos) so I cannot put them there
unless we create a new vendor for Joyent.

As George notes, they are only test files so we can
live without them if this is too much mess.

Pedro.