svn commit: r226835 - in head/sys: amd64/conf i386/conf ia64/conf pc98/conf powerpc/conf sparc64/conf

[Ken Smith]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/27/11 10:09 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> 
> On Oct 27, 2011, at 6:14 AM, Ken Smith wrote:
>> 
>> In response to one of my commits done to the ia64 GENERIC I
>> received some feedback giving a long list of issues (style,
>> formatting, seemingly gratuitous differences, annoyances, etc.)
>> with the whole set of GENERIC config files.  If anyone knows a
>> reason I should NOT act on the list to bring all the GENERIC's
>> into style compliance and whatnot let me know.  If nobody screams
>> I'll do what I can to fix them up in head some time after 9.0 is
>> finished.
> 
> If you're doing this in response to a private email, I very much 
> object if this is done without a review. I would really hate to see
> a lot of churn on the stable branch after RC1 for no reason.
> 
> FYI,
> 

It is in response to private email.  I would not do the commit without
getting review from at least the primary architecture maintainers and,
assuming it winds up being acceptable to the reviewers, I have no
intention of MFCing it.

- -- 
						Ken Smith
- - From there to here, from here to      |       kensmith at buffalo.edu
  there, funny things are everywhere.   |
                      - Theodor Geisel  |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk6qFOYACgkQ/G14VSmup/bqcgCgmf6hcDujuGu/6ux75pIkkjly
gd0AnjzQt++xzFf5WsIKqKhhKIeKod5e
=hcFB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----