svn commit: r220416 - head/sys/netgraph

Julian Elischer julian at freebsd.org
Thu Apr 7 19:54:11 UTC 2011


On 4/7/11 12:45 PM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 04:15:49PM +0200, Marko Zec wrote:
> M>  On Thursday 07 April 2011 15:54:40 Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> M>  >  On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 11:40:10AM +0000, Marko Zec wrote:
> M>  >  M>  Author: zec
> M>  >  M>  Date: Thu Apr  7 11:40:10 2011
> M>  >  M>  New Revision: 220416
> M>  >  M>  URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/220416
> M>  >  M>
> M>  >  M>  Log:
> M>  >  M>    Properly unref ng_hub nodes on shutdown, so that we don't leak them.
> M>  >  M>
> M>  >  M>    MFC after:	3 days
> M>  >  M>
> M>  >  M>  Modified:
> M>  >  M>    head/sys/netgraph/ng_hub.c
> M>  >  M>
> M>  >  M>  Modified: head/sys/netgraph/ng_hub.c
> M>  >  M>
> M>  >  ===========================================================================
> M>  >=== M>  --- head/sys/netgraph/ng_hub.c	Thu Apr  7 11:13:50 2011	(r220415) M>
> M>  >  +++ head/sys/netgraph/ng_hub.c	Thu Apr  7 11:40:10 2011	(r220416) M>  @@
> M>  >  -157,6 +157,8 @@ ng_hub_shutdown(node_p node)
> M>  >  M>   	const priv_p priv = NG_NODE_PRIVATE(node);
> M>  >  M>
> M>  >  M>   	free(priv, M_NETGRAPH_HUB);
> M>  >  M>  +	NG_NODE_SET_PRIVATE(node, NULL);
> M>  >  M>  +	NG_NODE_UNREF(node);
> M>  >  M>   	return (0);
> M>  >  M>   }
> M>  >
> M>  >  Do we really need NG_NODE_SET_PRIVATE()?
> M>
> M>  Most probably not, though the majority of .shutdown method implementations in
> M>  sys/netgraph do include a call to NG_NODE_SET_PRIVATE(node, NULL), so I did a
> M>  C/P from one of those for consistency.  If there's a consensus that
> M>  NG_NODE_SET_PRIVATE(node, NULL) in shutdown methods serves no useful purpose
> M>  then we should do a sweep across all the existing nodes...
>
> My humble opinion is that they should be swept. At least to avoid more c/p
> in future.
>
> Julian?
>

my opinion goes with anyone who is willing to do the work :-)




More information about the svn-src-all mailing list