svn commit: r220416 - head/sys/netgraph
Marko Zec
zec at freebsd.org
Thu Apr 7 14:27:59 UTC 2011
On Thursday 07 April 2011 15:54:40 Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 11:40:10AM +0000, Marko Zec wrote:
> M> Author: zec
> M> Date: Thu Apr 7 11:40:10 2011
> M> New Revision: 220416
> M> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/220416
> M>
> M> Log:
> M> Properly unref ng_hub nodes on shutdown, so that we don't leak them.
> M>
> M> MFC after: 3 days
> M>
> M> Modified:
> M> head/sys/netgraph/ng_hub.c
> M>
> M> Modified: head/sys/netgraph/ng_hub.c
> M>
> ===========================================================================
>=== M> --- head/sys/netgraph/ng_hub.c Thu Apr 7 11:13:50 2011 (r220415) M>
> +++ head/sys/netgraph/ng_hub.c Thu Apr 7 11:40:10 2011 (r220416) M> @@
> -157,6 +157,8 @@ ng_hub_shutdown(node_p node)
> M> const priv_p priv = NG_NODE_PRIVATE(node);
> M>
> M> free(priv, M_NETGRAPH_HUB);
> M> + NG_NODE_SET_PRIVATE(node, NULL);
> M> + NG_NODE_UNREF(node);
> M> return (0);
> M> }
>
> Do we really need NG_NODE_SET_PRIVATE()?
Most probably not, though the majority of .shutdown method implementations in
sys/netgraph do include a call to NG_NODE_SET_PRIVATE(node, NULL), so I did a
C/P from one of those for consistency. If there's a consensus that
NG_NODE_SET_PRIVATE(node, NULL) in shutdown methods serves no useful purpose
then we should do a sweep across all the existing nodes...
Marko
More information about the svn-src-all
mailing list