svn commit: r215544 - head/sys/kern

John Baldwin jhb at freebsd.org
Mon Nov 22 14:53:41 UTC 2010


On Friday, November 19, 2010 5:32:00 pm Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2010/11/19 John Baldwin <jhb at freebsd.org>:
> > On Friday, November 19, 2010 4:27:27 pm Attilio Rao wrote:
> >> 2010/11/19 John Baldwin <jhb at freebsd.org>:
> >> > On Friday, November 19, 2010 2:43:57 pm Attilio Rao wrote:
> >> >> Author: attilio
> >> >> Date: Fri Nov 19 19:43:56 2010
> >> >> New Revision: 215544
> >> >> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/215544
> >> >>
> >> >> Log:
> >> >>   Scan the list in reverse order for the shutdown handlers of loaded modules.
> >> >>   This way, when there is a dependency between two modules, the handler of the
> >> >>   latter probed runs first.
> >> >>
> >> >>   This is a similar approach as the modules are unloaded in the same
> >> >>   linkerfile.
> >> >>
> >> >>   Sponsored by:       Sandvine Incorporated
> >> >>   Submitted by:       Nima Misaghian <nmisaghian at sandvine dot com>
> >> >>   MFC after:  1 week
> >> >>
> >> >> Modified:
> >> >>   head/sys/kern/kern_module.c
> >> >>
> >> >> Modified: head/sys/kern/kern_module.c
> >> >> ==============================================================================
> >> >> --- head/sys/kern/kern_module.c       Fri Nov 19 18:59:35 2010        (r215543)
> >> >> +++ head/sys/kern/kern_module.c       Fri Nov 19 19:43:56 2010        (r215544)
> >> >> @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
> >> >>
> >> >>  static MALLOC_DEFINE(M_MODULE, "module", "module data structures");
> >> >>
> >> >> -typedef TAILQ_HEAD(, module) modulelist_t;
> >> >> +typedef TAILQ_HEAD(modulelst, module) modulelist_t;
> >> >
> >> > Is modulelist already taken?  If not, we should probably just retire
> >> > 'modulelist_t' and replace it with 'struct modulelist'.
> >>
> >> Note that I used modulelst, not modulelist.
> >> Probabilly, if you think the name may be still confusing, we can
> >> pickup one another further.
> >
> > Yes, I'd much prefer 'modulelist' with the extra 'i' as it is more readable.
> > If you go that route, I think you can drop modulelist_t since style(9)
> > discourages foo_t types unless they are required by a standard.
> 
> I think that this patch should make it?

Works for me, thanks.

-- 
John Baldwin


More information about the svn-src-all mailing list