svn commit: r191255 - in head/sys: amd64/conf conf i386/conf net
Sam Leffler
sam at freebsd.org
Tue Jun 9 17:19:18 UTC 2009
Kip Macy wrote:
>> I think FLOWTABLE does nto belong into DEFAULTS. Really DEFAULTS was
>> meant for "You cannot boot without this" and if people start to weaken
>> it, DEFAULTS will soon be the new GENERIC. That said I am not sure it
>> belongs to GENERIC either.
>>
>
> I can either push it in to GENERIC or I can change it to NOFLOWTABLE.
> If you want to remove it from GENERIC then we're going to have to have
> a lengthy discussion about what most FreeBSD users actually use and
> gut GENERIC as it stands now. The fact is, most FreeBSD users have
> sufficiently few peers that flowtable is a win over using the routing
> table on every lookup.
>
I believe the question was mainly about mechanics, FLOWTABLE doesn't
belong in DEFAULTS but it may well belong in GENERIC.
Sam
More information about the svn-src-all
mailing list