svn commit: r190943 - head/include

[Norikatsu Shigemura]

On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 23:00:54 -0400
> > > Can't we just put a patch in ports tree itself? What meant under 'no
> > > clean solution emerged'? I can prepare a patch, if needed.
> > 	I think so, too.  I have a quick hack patch.
> As I mentioned to vd@ on 3/20, I'd prefer something like
> that. Does your proposed patch also work for the ports that depend
> on GNU Pth, some of which may depend on signal.h?

	Yes, no problem!  Pth required singal.h's definision(SIGINT,
	SIGQUIT, ...), and it was already token care in pthread.h.in
	like following:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
/*
 * Protect namespace, because possibly existing vendor Pthread stuff
 * would certainly conflict with our defintions of pthread*_t.
 */
#define pthread_t              __vendor_pthread_t
  :
#include <sys/signal.h>    /* for sigset_t        */
  :
/*
 * Unprotect namespace, so we can define our own variants now
 */
#undef pthread_t
 :
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -