svn commit: r183819 - in stable/7/sys: . compat/linprocfs fs/procfs

[Dag-Erling Smørgrav]

Kostik Belousov <kostikbel at gmail.com> writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des at des.no> writes:
> > Roman Divacky <rdivacky at FreeBSD.org> writes:
> > > what about commiting this to note this change?
> > > +   <para>A serious problem emulating /proc for Linux was fixed.  Many Linux
> > > +      ports are now working including the linux-flashplugin9 port.</para>
> > "A serious problem was fixed"?  Really?  And if none of that software
> > worked before this commit, how come they were already in ports?
> I do not think that mentioning of this should appear in release notes,
> but Roman is mostly right in stating the fact.

Pretend you don't really know the details of the change, and reread
Roman's proposed relnotes entry.  Do you think it gives a correct
impression of the nature and severity of the issue?

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des at des.no