svn commit: r553259 - in head/deskutils/calendar: . files
Greg 'groggy' Lehey
grog at FreeBSD.org
Mon Oct 26 03:02:17 UTC 2020
On Sunday, 25 October 2020 at 18:37:34 -0700, Cy Schubert wrote:
> In message <20201026012126.GB19841 at eureka.lemis.com>, "Greg 'groggy' Lehey"
> wri
> tes:
>>> Anticipating the next step: removal of calendar from base, entirely.
>>
>> It's a bit late for that. We discussed this at length (too much
>> length for some people) on arch@, and we came to the agreement that
>> the base calendar(1) is a Good Thing, and only the data files needed
>> to go somewhere where they can be shared amongst projects.
>>
>> FWIW, *all* OSs that I've seen, with the possible exception of
>> Microsoft, have calendar(1). It serves a useful purpose. What's your
>> problem with it?
>
> The Linux distros I know of don't provide it, even as an optional RPM.
The machine I have access to, running Debian Testing, has it
apparently as a standard installation. Nobody on the system had asked
for it. But yes, I was surprised, too.
> IMO it's usefulness is questionable, especially with the multitude
> of tools that already do the same thing.
There is? I haven't found anything similar. That was one of the
things we discussed on arch@, but we came up empty-handed. If you
could come up with links, that would be very useful.
Greg
--
Sent from my desktop computer.
See complete headers for address and phone numbers.
This message is digitally signed. If your Microsoft mail program
reports problems, please read http://lemis.com/broken-MUA
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 163 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/attachments/20201026/002f12e3/attachment.sig>
More information about the svn-ports-head
mailing list