svn commit: r510920 - in head/sysutils: . syslog-ng syslog-ng323
Cy Schubert
Cy.Schubert at cschubert.com
Tue Sep 3 11:18:38 UTC 2019
In message <20190903082020.73tdsn7gio7svyfm at ivaldir.net>, Baptiste
Daroussin wr
ites:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 03:31:57AM +0000, Cy Schubert wrote:
> > Author: cy
> > Date: Tue Sep 3 03:31:56 2019
> > New Revision: 510920
> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/510920
> >=20
> > Log:
> > Thank you to Peter Czanik, of Balabit the producers of syslog-ng, for
> > a port of the new syslog-ng 3.23 branch. This is 3.23.1.
> > =20
> > Submitted by: Peter Czanik (CzP) <peter.czanik at oneidentity.com>
> > Balabit (a OneIdentity company) / syslog-ng upstream
>
> Do we really need all possible revision of syslog-ng in ports?
>
> Do they have that many incompatibilities between each others that is it
> mandatory to have all the supported one? isn't it possible to only live wit=
> h the
> lastest stable version? it seems most linux distribution are doing that and
> happy with it, so does pkgsrc and openbsd ports.
>
> I think it is more confusing users than it does help them to have 15 differ=
> ent
> version of syslog-ng in ports.
No we don't. I periodically cull older ones following consultation with our
upstream. It's probably time to do that again.
>
> Best regards,
> Bapt
--
Cheers,
Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert at cschubert.com>
FreeBSD UNIX: <cy at FreeBSD.org> Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org
The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few.
More information about the svn-ports-head
mailing list