svn commit: r502676 - in head/science: . opensph opensph/files

[Alexey Dokuchaev]

On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 02:32:25AM -0700, Yuri wrote:
> On 2019-05-27 02:19, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > There is a consensus WRT PORTNAMEs as well, I'm sure you can easily
> > notice it and obtain numbers with a simple shell script.  That said,
> > please, do not use mixed cased PORTNAMEs, "distinctive and diverse
> > shape" does not help it here but only creates needless inconsistency
> > and confusion.
> 
> This is easy: if you want this rule you should create a patch for the
> PHB with this rule.

I don't want to create or enforce rules, sometimes it's OK and actually
better to bend them, but it takes certain care and taste to known when
they can be bent.  This is not the right time.

I'm just asking you to realize, particularly in this case, that your
naming is very inconsistent with all the other OpenFOO ports we have in
the ports tree.  There are no reasons how could this be any better than
to follow existing, clearly visible, and universally adhered practice.

./danfe