svn commit: r470725 - in head/textproc/tkdiff: . files

Fernando Apesteguía fernando.apesteguia at gmail.com
Thu May 24 12:08:56 UTC 2018


El jue., 24 may. 2018 12:57, Mathieu Arnold <mat at freebsd.org> escribió:

> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 12:43:57PM +0200, Tobias C. Berner wrote:
> > That was what I suggested initially.
> >
> > But as you commented on the target used to install the file without also
> > weighing in on the issue of adding binaries, I assumed it was fine :)
>
> I cannot see everything, and most of the times, when my focus catches on
> a big mistake, like the two targets, it usually means the Makefile has
> larger structural problems that needs addressed first, so I do not delve
> too much on what goes on.  When the Makefile looks saner, and a quick
> glance cannot find anything blatantly wrong, I look deeper into things.
> But in any way, I am human, and I miss stuff.
>

I can prepare an alternative with an icons .tgz distribution and work this
out with the maintainer.

Sounds good?


> > mfg Tobias
> >
> > On 24 May 2018 at 08:55, Mathieu Arnold <mat at freebsd.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 06:25:37AM +0000, Tobias Kortkamp wrote:
> > > > 2. print/jabref, misc/mc, editors/openoffice-devel, etc. seem to have
> > > >    binary files in files/*.png. Can we add new ones or is it
> forbidden
> > > now?
> > > >    It seems weird to have to base64 encode icons and decode them
> during
> > > the
> > > >    build.
> > >
> > > I think it would be better to keep binary files out of the ports tree.
> > > It's probably as easy to drop them in LOCAL/user, either individually
> or
> > > in an archive.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Mathieu Arnold
> > >
>
> --
> Mathieu Arnold
>


More information about the svn-ports-head mailing list