svn commit: r410453 - in head/math/fityk: . files

wenheping wenheping2000 at hotmail.com
Tue Mar 8 08:56:44 UTC 2016



> Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 08:41:19 +0000
> From: danfe at FreeBSD.org
> To: wenheping2000 at hotmail.com
> CC: ports-committers at freebsd.org; svn-ports-all at freebsd.org; svn-ports-head at freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r410453 - in head/math/fityk: . files
> 
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 04:23:53PM +0800, wenheping wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 08:10:10 +0000, danfe at FreeBSD.org wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 09:22:54AM +0800, wenheping wrote:
> > > > I did not find 'not mute installation" is wrong in Porter's Handbook.
> > > 
> > > It might not be articulated loud enough, but it's pretty obvious once you
> > > think about it: muted commands won't appear in the build log, which makes
> > > it harder to debug and fix any issues.
> > > 
> > > mkdir's are often muted because they do not have the same "debug value"
> > > as installation commands, but all cp/COPYTREE_SHARE/ln/etc. commands
> > > should not be muted.  This is pretty common knowledge in our community,
> > > I find it strange that you've never heard of it.
> > 
> > To me mkdir has the same debug-value as cp
> 
> That's OK, you might mute or not mute mkdir's at your own discretion.
> 
> > and I judge the "common knowledge in our community" by Porter's Handbook
> > or portlint.
> 
> Truth is that most valuable pieces of wisdom are scattered across maillist
> discussions and stuff (FWIW, portlint(1) does warn about muted INSTALL_foo

I hope "most valuable pieces of wisdom" should go into Handbook or portlint,
but not only exists in maillist.
 


> commands, not sure if it does so for cp/COPYTREE_SHARE/ln though).
> 
> ./danfe
> 
 		 	   		  


More information about the svn-ports-head mailing list