svn commit: r396998 - head/net/samba36

[Alexey Dokuchaev]

On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 12:17:04PM +0200, John Marino wrote:
> On 9/19/2015 9:42 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > I'm fine with clear and umabiguous rules too.  I just want bumping rules
> > to become more granular.  Plain "package changed -> need a bump" means
> > that fixing a typo in pkg-descr would require it.  Don't you think this
> > is a bit too extreme?
> 
> I think there is already an exception for metadata changes such as
> pkg-descr and COMMENT and MAINTAINER, although I don't know if this
> exception is documented (it is done in practice).  However shebang fixes
> are functional and definitely need a bump.  They can be the difference
> between functioning and non-functioning packages.

Right; however, in this particular case it was *examples* what were fixed,
which in fact are not ready to be run on FreeBSD as is.  I can totaly see
why Timur got upset about this particular bump.

./danfe