Do we need chinese/joe (Re: svn commit: r382116 - in head/editors/joe: . files)

[Bryan Drewery]

On 3/27/2015 10:55 AM, Mikhail T. wrote:
> On 27.03.2015 11:08, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> This broke chinese/joe
> Indeed, sorry about that. The fix is easy, but I wonder, why chinese/joe
> exists in the first place -- the sole difference between it and
> editors/joe is /two lines/ in the installed etc/rjoerc file. That is
> all, the port's additional patch:
> 
>     http://distcache.FreeBSD.org/local-distfiles/chinsan/patch/zh-joe-3.7.diff
> 
> achieves... Maybe, we can eliminate the additional port?
> 
>     -mi
> 

I have no personal opinion on it but it would need to go through a
deprecation period IMO.

-- 
Regards,
Bryan Drewery

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/attachments/20150327/090b6129/attachment.sig>