svn commit: r382341 - in head/lang: gcc46 gcc47 gcc48 gcc49 gcc5

[Bryan Drewery]

On 3/26/2015 3:36 PM, John Marino wrote:
> Author: marino
> Date: Thu Mar 26 20:36:04 2015
> New Revision: 382341
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/382341
> QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r382341/
> 
> Log:
>   lang/gcc(46,47,48,49,5): Use OPTIONS_EXCLUDE_DragonFly to block JAVA
>   
>   The JAVA frontend doesn't build on DragonFly on any release.  The new
>   OPTIONS_EXCLUDE_${OPSYS} feature is a nice way to avoid the use of
>   Makefile.DragonFly (most are in dports, but one is in lang/gcc5).
>   
>   The recent addition of CXXFLAGS to lang/gcc5 prevents Makefile.DragonFly
>   on lang/gcc5 from being removed outright.  There are a couple of options
>   available to allow its removal, but I'll need to discuss with Gerald.
>   
>   Approved by:	DragonFly blanket
> 


Why do you ignore all feedback? I find this as grounds for removal of
commit bit.

Why do DragonFly hacks belong in FreeBSD Ports? Not even DragonFly uses
FreeBSD Ports, it uses dports. So why can these hacks not be in dports?

Bryan

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/attachments/20150326/bff90244/attachment.sig>