svn commit: r359172 - head/devel/gnulib

Baptiste Daroussin bapt at freebsd.org
Tue Jun 24 23:41:47 UTC 2014


On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 04:37:55PM -0700, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 24 June 2014 15:59, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt at freebsd.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 03:56:58PM -0700, Eitan Adler wrote:
> >> On 24 June 2014 15:52, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt at freebsd.org> wrote:
> >> > Author: bapt
> >> > Date: Tue Jun 24 22:52:47 2014
> >> > New Revision: 359172
> >> > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/359172
> >> > QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r359172/
> >> >
> >> > Log:
> >> >   Use MAKE_CMD
> >> >
> >> > Modified:
> >> >   head/devel/gnulib/Makefile
> >> >
> >> > Modified: head/devel/gnulib/Makefile
> >> > ==============================================================================
> >> > --- head/devel/gnulib/Makefile  Tue Jun 24 22:51:41 2014        (r359171)
> >> > +++ head/devel/gnulib/Makefile  Tue Jun 24 22:52:47 2014        (r359172)
> >> > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ post-patch:
> >> >                 ${WRKSRC}/doc/Makefile
> >> >
> >> >  do-build:
> >> > -       cd ${WRKSRC} && ${GMAKE} -C doc info html
> >> > +       cd ${WRKSRC} && ${SETENV} ${MAKE_ENV} ${MAKE_CMD} -C doc info html
> >>
> >> Any chance of a convenience shorthand for "${SETENV} ${MAKE_ENV} ${MAKE_CMD}" ?
> >
> > You have DO_MAKE_BUILD that basically do that
> 
> Is there a reason you aren't using it?
> 
> (I'm not saying you should, I am asking to know for myself if I should be).
> 
Because it might have side effect here I don't want to experiment :)

regards,
Bapt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/attachments/20140625/57fa5355/attachment.sig>


More information about the svn-ports-head mailing list