svn commit: r357483 - in head: . devel/icu

[Tijl Coosemans]

On Thu, 12 Jun 2014 11:37:08 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 11:25:27AM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>> On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 14:31:01 +0000 (UTC) Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>> Author: bapt
>>> Date: Wed Jun 11 14:31:01 2014
>>> New Revision: 357483
>>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/357483
>>> QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r357483/
>>> 
>>> Log:
>>>   Update to icu 53.1, recommand to the user to rebuild all their applications depending on icu
>>> 
>>> Modified:
>>>   head/UPDATING
>>>   head/devel/icu/Makefile
>>>   head/devel/icu/distinfo
>>>   head/devel/icu/pkg-plist
>>> 
>>> Modified: head/UPDATING
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- head/UPDATING	Wed Jun 11 14:28:11 2014	(r357482)
>>> +++ head/UPDATING	Wed Jun 11 14:31:01 2014	(r357483)
>>> @@ -5,6 +5,20 @@ they are unavoidable.
>>>  You should get into the habit of checking this file for changes each time
>>>  you update your ports collection, before attempting any port upgrades.
>>>  
>>> +20140611:
>>> +  AFFECTS: users of icu
>>> +  AUTHOR: bapt at FreeBSD.org
>>> +
>>> +  icu has been updated to 53.1. Please rebuild all ports that depend on it
>>> +  if you have the glib20 port built with COLLATION_FIX option activated
>> 
>> Because of the library version change all ports that depend on icu need
>> to be rebuild right?  Not just the ones that depend on glib.
> 
> Yes the problem is if glib was built with icu it might leak the dependency
> to all the packages linked to glib (until glib switch to USES=libtool)
> without that I could just bump the revision of the needed packages

Yes, but what I'm saying is that I think you should remove "if you have
the glib20 ... activated".  Right now it sounds like the message only
applies to users which have the COLLATION_FIX option enabled which isn't
true.  It applies to everyone.