svn commit: r361646 - in head/net/samba36: . files

[Baptiste Daroussin]

On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:43:26PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 01:12:43PM +0100, Vsevolod Stakhov wrote:
> > Then we would have different packages with the same version. And pkg
> > will not perform an upgrade. Nontheless, in the current scheme, we take
> > unnecessary fields, such as licenses or comments, into consideration.
> 
> About the "different packages with the same version" -- but aren't you
> trying to come up with more fine-grained criteria for pkg to understand
> if it's time to upgrade, not just look at version/revision/epoch?  (Or
> perhaps I'm just understanding "same version" wrongly in this context.)
> 
> > Moreover, manifest cannot rely on svn, so if you take a look on some
> > manifest generated from a port you could figure out what fields are
> 
> I would say that pkg(8) cannot rely on svn (and that's natural), but we
> can insert last change rev into +MANIFEST when generating it, no?  So
> it will just become another field akin to version and revision.
> 
> > likely important and what fields are just meaningless. I'd like to
> > remind that my current set is the following:
> > 
> > *  maintainer
> > *  www
> > *  message
> > *  comment
> 
> I agree with Michael here; these four fields IMHO should be dropped from
> consideration (irregardless of if svn rev can/will be embedded or not).
> 
> ./danfe
> 
> P.S.  About that +MANIFEST file: can we please please please make it
> human readable?  Like, break the lines, use indentation, etc.  Maybe it
> is more appropriate to keep +COMPACT_MANIFEST as one-liner, although I
> am not convinced that separate +COMPACT_MANIFEST should exist at all.
> 

If you want a human readable version uses the -R options from pkg info/search
The one inside the tar file is not made to be human readable :)

regards,
Bapt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/attachments/20140716/b49f6909/attachment.sig>