svn commit: r344731 - in head: Mk Templates/Licenses

[Eitan Adler]

On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Pietro Cerutti <gahr at gahr.ch> wrote:
> On 2014-Feb-19, 09:05, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:34 AM, Pietro Cerutti <gahr at freebsd.org> wrote:
>> > On 2014-Feb-19, 01:10, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Pietro Cerutti <gahr at freebsd.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Log:
>> >> >   - Add PostgreSQL license to the database
>> >> > +_LICENSE_NAME_PGSQL=   PostgreSQL Licence (PostgreSQL)
>> >>
>> >> Please call this "PostgreSQL" or "POSTGRESQL".  Despite the existing
>> >> styles, I think the mixed-case version is better. We use the
>> >> identifier as seen on this page: https://spdx.org/licenses/.
>> >
>> > Excuse me? /me confused.
>>
>> Thats what I get for doing anything at 1:00AM.
>>
>> We use the SPDX license list as a canonical source for license
>> identifiers and names.  Therefore the license ID should be
>> "PostgreSQL" and it should be named "PostgreSQL License".
>> In the past I've asked that the entire ID be uppercased.  I now think
>> thats a bad idea and we should just go with the exact id as named
>> upstream.
>
> By "license ID" you mean what is currently "PGSQL"?

Yes.  Sorry for the confusion.



-- 
Eitan Adler
Source, Ports, Doc committer
Bugmeister, Ports Security teams