svn commit: r370220 - in head/biology: . ncbi-blast

[Jason Bacon]

On 12/30/14 04:40, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Michael Gmelin <grembo at freebsd.org> writes:
>> I don't really follow the argument of bumping portepoch (it's not a
>> very explicit way of stating that this is not the original version -
>> IMHO it's actually not what portepoch is about).
> I never asked anyone to bump PORTEPOCH.  I merely pointed out that if
> the ncbi-blast name were to be used for BLAST, PORTEPOCH would have to
> be bumped due to PORTVERSION regressing from 2.2.30 to 2.2.26.
>
> DES

A valid point.  Not likely to happen, since the only other candidate for 
the name ncbi-blast already exists as ncbi-toolkit.

Still, I would not be averse to renaming it just for clarity.  I would 
suggest "ncbi-blast+".  I don't know if there are any taboos about using 
a '+' in a port name, but there are currently 64 ports that do it and I 
like to keep things short and sweet.

Now would be the time to do this, since it's still new and not yet a 
dependency for any other ports.

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   Jason W. Bacon
   jwbacon at tds.net

   Circumstances don't make a man:
   They reveal him.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~