svn commit: r370220 - in head/biology: . ncbi-blast

[John Marino]

On 12/28/2014 20:43, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> John Marino <freebsd.contact at marino.st> writes:
>> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des at des.no> writes:
>>> The original BLAST is at 2.2.26, while BLAST+ is at 2.2.30.
>> so what?  a PORTEPOCH is matched to a specific package name.
> 
> Yes, and this name cannot be used for the original BLAST program without
> bumping PORTEPOCH.  This port should have been named ncbi-blast-plus or
> something similar.

This is just an opinion.  There is no technical basis for bumping
PORTEPOCH.  To boil this down, you are saying the port has a misleading
name and should have been named something else by Jason who submitted
the PR to add the port.

John