svn commit: r370220 - in head/biology: . ncbi-blast

[Dag-Erling Smørgrav]

John Marino <freebsd.contact at marino.st> writes:
> It's a brand new port with a unique name.  Why is "bumping PORTEPOCH"
> considered necessary?

The original BLAST is at 2.2.26, while BLAST+ is at 2.2.30.

> Why is the existence of this port blocking the introduction of a new
> BLAST port?

It is not BLAST, but is called blast.

> It seems that all that is needs is to update the pkg-descr file to
> specify it's the blast+ implementation.

BLAST and BLAST+ are two different programs.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des at des.no