svn commit: r375258 - head/comms/owfs

Baptiste Daroussin bapt at FreeBSD.org
Tue Dec 23 09:58:47 UTC 2014


On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 08:32:57AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 09:16:44AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 02:05:42AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 06:37:58PM +0000, Pawel Pekala wrote:
> > > Why does it use bogus "gmake:lite"?  I'd really want to see these
> > > obnoxious *-lite ports gone.  I didn't find the reasoning for :lite
> > > in the PR, did I miss it (if yes, how feasible would it be to fix it
> > > properly)?
> > 
> > gmake:lite is only usefull and should only be used to avoid chicken/egg
> > problems basically it has been created for anything gmake can depend on
> > which may itself only be buildable with gmake (textinfo for example) it
> > should not at all be used in all other cases.
> 
> How feasible would be to patch textinfo and friends from gnumake'isms?  I
> am willing to investigate; having a separate `devel/gmake-lite' leaf port
> both looks strange and people would want to use it without giving it much
> thought.

I haven't spent much time on it. just did a quick look and figured out that was
not that easy iirc.
> 
> ./danfe
> 
> P.S.  Baptiste, what had happened to your comma key recently?  It would be
> a lot easier to read through your letters if you would've used them.
> 
It has been eaten by my cat :)

Bapt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/attachments/20141223/b4409d99/attachment.sig>


More information about the svn-ports-head mailing list