svn commit: r366349 - head/archivers/rpm4

[John Marino]

On 8/29/2014 12:00, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> * Tijl Coosemans (tijl at FreeBSD.org) wrote:
> 
>> Does it test with a non-default prefix maybe?  Because these directories
>> really are in lang/python27/pkg-plist.  It would at least have to be
>> dirrmtry here, because other ports install files in those directories.
> 
> Strange, poudriere doesn't complain on these any more (no, I haven't
> used non-default prefix). So I've removed them.
> 
> And yes, @dirrmtry should've been used here. Regarding directories
> shared by multiple ports, I still don't have clear understanding:
> on one hand, if a directory is managed by dependency, it shouldn't
> appear in the port plist. On the other hand, if a port is installed
> with non-default prefix, it should manage all dirs it uses on its
> own. I probably would prefer the latter as it's more flexible and
> less error prone (what if dependent ports plist change and directory
> is no longer shared).

if the directory is provided by a dependency 100% of the cases, then it
shouldn't be in pkg-plist because it will try-fail 100% of the time.

The non-standard prefix isn't an issue because all ports will have the
same non-standard prefix.  There's no difference.

John