svn commit: r307899 - head/benchmarks/super-smack

[Alexey Dokuchaev]

On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:09:20PM +0200, Alex Kozlov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 04:08:25PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > They are essentially the same modulo "enable" word, which was decided to
> > remove some time ago.  In fact, "generic" descriptions are better since they
> > mention that is it *database* support.  Doug removed the word "support" in
> > r305288, which many folks disagree with, but it will be backed out one we
> > will have dialog4ports committed, which will allow proper support for
> > checklists and radiobuttons.  You can leave them now, but after r305288 will
> > be backed out, I will ask you again to drop them.
> > 
> Will do, my point was that 'MySQL support' is better than 'MySQL database'.

Yes, I agree, I also very much miss "support" word.  :-)

> > It is not technically obsolete; sometimes it is the only attribution we
> > can provide.  If there is actual WWW page, it should be dropped.
> 
> It looks not hard to implement. Is it documented somewhere?

Not sure, probably not.  pkg-descr was always kinda gray area, since most
people do not really care how does it look (or do they look).  So I think
there are no firm standards.  I would suggest use your best judgment and
sense of aesthetics.  It's good that at least recently we seem to have
consensus on preferring space to tab after WWW: (and similar) lines.

> Thanks for your reviews.

Thank *you* for accepting them.

./danfe