svn commit: r302434 - head/sysutils/ltrace

[Beat Gätzi]

On Aug 12, 2012, at 10:54 PM, Sofian Brabez wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 09:45:27PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
>> On 12 Aug 2012 22:22, "Sofian Brabez" <sbz at freebsd.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 11:15:46AM +0000, Chris Rees wrote:
>>>> Author: crees
>>>> Date: Sun Aug 12 11:15:46 2012
>>>> New Revision: 302434
>>>> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/302434
>>>> 
>>>> Log:
>>>>  Forced commit to note that this port was formerly available at r278685
>>>> 
>>>> Modified:
>>>>  head/sysutils/ltrace/Makefile
>>>>  head/sysutils/ltrace/distinfo
>>>>  head/sysutils/ltrace/pkg-descr
>>>>  head/sysutils/ltrace/pkg-plist
>>>> 
>>>> Modified: head/sysutils/ltrace/Makefile
>>>> 
>> ==============================================================================
>>>> 
>>>> Modified: head/sysutils/ltrace/distinfo
>>>> 
>> ==============================================================================
>>>> 
>>>> Modified: head/sysutils/ltrace/pkg-descr
>>>> 
>> ==============================================================================
>>>> 
>>>> Modified: head/sysutils/ltrace/pkg-plist
>>>> 
>> ==============================================================================
>>> 
>>> Hi think, you refer to the bad revision log, indeed you wouldn't refer to
>>> r278685 because it's about devel/eboxy deletion.
>>> 
>>> Moreorever, please next time, ask approvement to commit in a port you
>> don't own,
>>> after all it's the rule !
>> 
>> I referred to the last revision where the port was alive.
>> 
>> If you objected, perhaps you could have replied to my email.
>> 
>> Chris
> 
> No objections, I prefer to be inform before that's it.
> 
> I'm not reading all emails I recieved, too much spam :)
> 
> Could you details, what you did exactly to 'force commit' ? with command as an
> example for next time to keep history. Thanks !

This is described in the Subversion primer:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsSubversionPrimer

Please note that usually a forced commit is no longer needed if the port
has been readded correctly. See the "Readding a removed port" section in
the primer.

Beat