svn commit: r568012 - head/net/tightvnc

[Mathieu Arnold]

On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 02:54:19PM +0100, Piotr Kubaj wrote:
> I know what you mean and this will just make more work for people caring about ARM / PPC. I add USE_GCC=any simply because there ARE issues with clang, so removing USE_GCC=any to check whether something builds doesn't make any sense.
> 
> If there's any person who will remove USE_GCC=any and test for regressions on all architectures, that's ok for me.

I have no idea of the state of USE_GCC=any, as it is something nobody
should use nowadays in favor of USE_GCC=yes (and Gerald says that often
enough), I would have thought that those were old stuff that dated back
from the dinosaurs era and that could be tried without gcc.

Now, if ports that have USE_GCC=any got it in the last few years, they
probably need it, but we don't know until we try.

-- 
Mathieu Arnold
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 963 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/attachments/20210317/acf8215c/attachment.sig>