svn commit: r561652 - in head/databases: libgda5-mdb mdbtools mdbtools/files recutils
Alexey Dokuchaev
danfe at freebsd.org
Sat Mar 6 16:43:05 UTC 2021
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 05:16:25PM +0000, Rainer Hurling wrote:
> New Revision: 561652
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/561652
>
> Log:
> databases/mdbtools: Update to 0.9.1
>
> - Switch to a new fork on Github
> - Split NLS (gettext) as an option
> - Remove gmdb2 GUI (will come back as own port)
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D28118
DR subject says "update to 0.9.2", but the port was updated to 0.9.1,
are there some problems with 0.9.2?
> ...
> Modified: head/databases/mdbtools/Makefile
> ==============================================================================
> --- head/databases/mdbtools/Makefile Fri Jan 15 15:57:58 2021 (r561651)
> +++ head/databases/mdbtools/Makefile Fri Jan 15 17:16:25 2021 (r561652)
> @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
> -# Created by: Anders Nordby <anders at fix.no>
We typically keep these lines out of respect to the original port author
and appreciation of their efforts. While they are optional for new ports,
one should not remove them unless under explicit concent of that person.
Did you obtain that from Anders?
> +USE_GITHUB= yes
> +GH_ACCOUNT= mdbtools
This is the default valute for GH_ACCOUNT so no need to set it.
> Modified: head/databases/recutils/Makefile
> ==============================================================================
> --- head/databases/recutils/Makefile Fri Jan 15 15:57:58 2021 (r561651)
> +++ head/databases/recutils/Makefile Fri Jan 15 17:16:25 2021 (r561652)
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
>
> PORTNAME= recutils
> PORTVERSION= 1.8
> +PORTREVISION= 1
You should've checked all consumer ports that they actually can build
against updated port, no just merely bump port revision, even if this
dependency is optional and disabled by default. There had been some
changes in public API so `databases/recutils' failed to build with MDB
option enabled. I've fixed the port in r567461 and enabled MDB by
default so this breakage could be caught earlier next time.
./danfe
More information about the svn-ports-all
mailing list