svn commit: r535306 - in branches/2020Q2: . dns dns/bind914 dns/dnsperf net/samba410

Ben Woods woodsb02 at gmail.com
Sun May 31 02:08:55 UTC 2020


On Sun, 31 May 2020 at 08:07, Ben Woods <woodsb02 at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 16 May 2020 at 00:42, Mathieu Arnold <mat at freebsd.org> wrote:
>
>> Author: mat
>> Date: Fri May 15 16:42:41 2020
>> New Revision: 535306
>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/535306
>>
>> Log:
>>   Remove expired ports:
>>
>>   dns/dnsperf: depends on expired dns/bind914, not compatible with
>> dns/bind916
>>   2020-04-30 dns/bind914: End of life, please migrate to a newer version
>> of BIND9
>>
>> Deleted:
>>   branches/2020Q2/dns/bind914/
>>   branches/2020Q2/dns/dnsperf/
>> Modified:
>>   branches/2020Q2/MOVED
>>   branches/2020Q2/dns/Makefile   (contents, props changed)
>>   branches/2020Q2/net/samba410/Makefile   (contents, props changed)
>>
>
> Hi Mat,
>
> Can I please ask what the logic was for doing this in a quarterly branch?
>
> Regards,
> Ben
>

Hi again,

For the record, I am not against this change. In fact, I think it is going
to make it easier to backport the latest security update to net/samba410
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246721

I was just surprised to see expired ports removed from quarterly, rather
than just being done in head and aging out when the next quarterly branch
occurs on 1 July.

I guess what I am asking is - what is the procedure for expired ports in
quarterly, and is this documented somewhere?

Regards,
Ben


More information about the svn-ports-all mailing list