svn commit: r525624 - in head/shells: . ksh2020

[Marcin Cieslak]

On Thu, 13 Feb 2020, Cy Schubert wrote:

> Resending this. I managed to get an email address wrong.
>
> There appears to be growing support for the next generation of ksh.
>
> https://github.com/att/ast/issues/1470
>
> We already have ksh93 and ksh93-devel. Current thinking is to copy rename
> ksh93 to a new name in line with the new project, whatever they decide.
> ksh93-devel will be copied to a new ksh<something>-devel, tracking the new
> project while ksh93-devel itself  will revert back to the AT&T 2020/02/08
> rebase. That leaves ast-ksh which IMO should be renamed back to ksh93.
>
> The todo at the moment is to see what the community decides. But this is
> currently my thinking about this.

Thank you Cy for bringing this up - I am ok with renaming ast-ksh back to ksh93.

Marcin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3663 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/attachments/20200213/567c76c2/attachment.bin>