svn commit: r531474 - in head/net: . samba411 samba411/files samba411/files/man

[Matthias Andree]

Am 14.04.20 um 15:47 schrieb Mathieu Arnold:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 01:45:39PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 03:42:42PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 02:00:35AM +0000, Timur I. Bakeyev wrote:
>>>> New Revision: 531474
>>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/531474
>>>>
>>>> Log:
>>>>   Add new Samba 4.11 port
>>>
>>> Thank you for trying to work on FreeBSD ports, now, this needs to be
>>> added with a svn cp of a previous version.  Please remove this and add
>>> it properly.
>>
>> This probably applies to `databases/ldb20' as well (r530544).  I've
>> pinged Timur, but never heard back.
> 
> Best would probably to remove those ports in the mean time.

I'll call that recommendation "damaging" because nobody has shown how
the resulting package were broken. So why should a broken port be taken
away from ports users again, with MOVED churn, repo churn and whatnot?

Other than for a blind ambition of trying to get the last bit of
metadata correct that bears no *practical* relevance, there is none.
It's a waste of time and must stop.