svn commit: r502676 - in head/science: . opensph opensph/files

[Baptiste Daroussin]

On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 09:41:54AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 02:32:25AM -0700, Yuri wrote:
> > On 2019-05-27 02:19, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > There is a consensus WRT PORTNAMEs as well, I'm sure you can easily
> > > notice it and obtain numbers with a simple shell script.  That said,
> > > please, do not use mixed cased PORTNAMEs, "distinctive and diverse
> > > shape" does not help it here but only creates needless inconsistency
> > > and confusion.
> > 
> > This is easy: if you want this rule you should create a patch for the
> > PHB with this rule.
> 
> I don't want to create or enforce rules, sometimes it's OK and actually
> better to bend them, but it takes certain care and taste to known when
> they can be bent.  This is not the right time.
> 
> I'm just asking you to realize, particularly in this case, that your
> naming is very inconsistent with all the other OpenFOO ports we have in
> the ports tree.  There are no reasons how could this be any better than
> to follow existing, clearly visible, and universally adhered practice.
> 
> ./danfe
> 

Just the statistics here:

Only 6 mixed cases:
OpenClaw-0.0.51_3
OpenHMD-0.2.0.215_1
OpenSP-1.5.2_3
OpenSSH-askpass-1.2.4.1_3
OpenSim-core-4.0_2
OpenTomb-2018.02.03.a_1

For 181 non mixed cases.



Best regards,
Bapt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/attachments/20190527/38eb0d3e/attachment-0001.sig>