svn commit: r471061 - head/audio/qjackctl

[Yuri]

On 05/28/18 19:33, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> That's exactly the right approach here: leave both options, let the user
> choose.  I'm still defaulting my ports to Qt4 (at least trying to), and
> sometimes even provide -qt4 as a separate port.  I'm perfectly happy with
> Qt4, less happy with Qt5, and see no need to use Qt5.  But I'm just as
> happy with Qt5 being default*as long as*  I can tell the port that I want
> Qt4 instead.
>
> Removing working option just because it's not useful for you Yuri is not
> your best act here, esp. after you've been explicitly asked for it.


You didn't show that sticking to Qt4 is specifically useful for anybody 
for valid reasons though. You only stated your dislike of Qt5 without 
reasons.

Please show that switch of the app to Qt5 actually harms anybody, causes 
them loss of time, functionality, pain or suffering, or any other 
adverse consequences.

So far all I see is that all the apps that I use work in Qt5 the same 
way or better than in Qt4.

Yuri