svn commit: r469188 - head/ports-mgmt/pkg_replace

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hi!

> On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 10:50:12AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > *facepalm*.  This poudriere-driven development is more and more disturbing.
> > You didn't attempt to understand the problem, you didn't attempt to fix the
> > PLIST_FILES (remove bogus %%ETCDIR%% since this is Makefile), you didn't
> > ask for a peer review.  meta@ pessimized the port, provided wrong commit
> > log (it tells *nothing* about poudriere failing with a signal 6 in make
> > package, it says "pet portlint"), and you've approved it like there's
> > nothing wrong with all of this. :-(
> 
> Sorry about that. I understand what I should have done and I could do.
> Then what should I do next?  Should I turn back to PLIST_FILES?  What should
> I do from the next time not to repeat such a folly?

Right now it's OK as it is. The pkg bus error needs to be investigated
and a problem report should be done that helps the maintainers
of pkg(8) to fix the issue.

After the cause is fixed, the port can return to PLIST_FILES (if possible).

But it's nothing that we should become religious about it, but
if it helps danfe's adrenaline pegel...

-- 
pi at FreeBSD.org         +49 171 3101372              2 years to go !